B-SLR Activities, Outcomes and Methodological Pillars

The table below provides an overview of the activities, outcomes, methodological foundations, and key references designed to support the understanding and application of each step in the B-SLR framework. The table also outlines methodological checkpoints to ensure alignment with the B-SLR principles, offering reflection opportunities at critical review process stages. These checkpoints encourage researchers to reassess and refine their approach iteratively. If initial findings lack sufficient depth, researchers are prompted to revisit earlier steps, reevaluating methodological decisions, outcomes, and conclusions. This iterative approach enhances the rigour and scope of the analysis, potentially revealing overlooked patterns or refining theoretical frameworks, leading to more robust and insightful results.

A printable PDF is available for download here.

References

Alegre, J., Callahan, J., & Iszatt-White, M. (2023). Innovative conceptual contributions—Raising the game for theory-driven reviews. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(2), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12333

Balzano, M. (2022). Serendipity in management studies: A literature review and future research directions. Management Decision, 60(13), 130-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2022-0245

Bascur, J. P., Verberne, S., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). Academic information retrieval using citation clusters: In-depth evaluation based on systematic reviews. Scientometrics, 128(5), 2895-2921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04681-x

Breslin, D., & Gatrell, C. (2023). Theorizing through literature reviews: The miner-prospector continuum. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 139-167.

Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., Pellegrini, M. M., & Dabić, M. (2021). Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Journal of Business Research, 123, 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.053

Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ—part 1: Topic choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432-435. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61965960

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Fan, D., Breslin, D., Callahan, J. L., & Iszatt-White, M. (2022). Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope, and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291

Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, 22(6), 229-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851

Klarin, A. (2024). How to conduct a bibliometric content analysis: Guidelines and contributions of content co-occurrence or co-word literature reviews. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13031. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13031

Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E., & Rabetino, R. (2022). Making connections: Harnessing the diversity of strategy‐as‐practice research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 210-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12274

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Kuhrmann, M., Fernández, D. M., & Daneva, M. (2017). On the pragmatic design of literature studies in software engineering: An experience-based guideline. Empirical Software Engineering, 22(6), 2852-2891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9492-y

Laaser, K., & Bolton, S. (2022). Absolute autonomy, respectful recognition and derived dignity: Towards a typology of meaningful work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(3), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12282

Marzi, G., Balzano, M., & Marchiori, D. (2024). K-Alpha Calculator–Krippendorff's Alpha Calculator: A user-friendly tool for computing Krippendorff's Alpha inter-rater reliability coefficient. MethodsX, 12, 102545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102545

Marzi, G., Ciampi, F., Dalli, D., & Dabic, M. (2021). New product development during the last ten years: The ongoing debate and future avenues. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 330-344. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2997386

McAllister, J. T., Lennertz, L., & Atencio Mojica, Z. (2022). Mapping a discipline: A guide to using VOSviewer for bibliometric and visual analysis. Science & Technology Libraries, 41(3), 319-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Others. (2021a). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Others. (2021b). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

Pellegrini, M. M., Ciampi, F., Marzi, G., & Orlando, B. (2020). The relationship between knowledge management and leadership: Mapping the field and providing future research avenues. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(6), 1445-1492. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2020-0034

Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C., & Prescott, J. E. (2020). Advancing theory with review articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12549

Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475-515. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211651

Schmiedel, T., Muller, O., & vom Brocke, J. (2018). Topic modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 22(3), 941-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118773858

Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113-5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341

Thomas, L. D. W., & Tee, R. (2022). Generativity: A systematic review and conceptual framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12277

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/153448431667160

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Turzo, T., Marzi, G., Favino, C., & Terzani, S. (2022). Non-financial reporting research and practice: Lessons from the last decade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131154

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Wagenschwanz, A. M. (2022). The identity of entrepreneurs: Providing conceptual clarity and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 64-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12241

Williams, R. I., Clark, L. A., Clark, W. R., & Raffo, D. M. (2021). Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: Additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Journal, 39(4), 521-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.007

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Google Sites

Report abuse